five. Uncovered Deputy Prosecutor General as well as counsel for the complainant further argued that during the investigation of the case the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi led for the recovery of sleeping capsules on 14.02.2018. The report of Punjab Forensic Science Agency, Lahore has become manufactured before the Court wherein the sleeping drugs were declared to be comprising “Alprazolam and Procyclidin” whereas “Diazepam” and “Chloroquin” were detected while in the liver but not inside the tummy. For this reason, the recovery of explained sleeping tablets hardly connects the petitioner Mst. Mubeena Bibi with the crime complained of. Realized Deputy Prosecutor General together with counsel for that complainant have also argued that during the investigation with the case the petitioner Bhoora led on the recovery of a motorcycle.
In other circumstances as discussed supra pensionary benefits cannot be stopped on account of criminal charges after the retirement of two years; and, is violative in the law laid down by the Supreme Court within the case of Haji Muhammad Ismail Memon, PLD 2007 SC 35. Consequently, the competent authority of the parent department of your petitioner plus the Chief Secretary, Sindh, are liable to release the pensionary amount of your petitioner and shell out the pension amount and other ancillary benefits into the petitioner to which he is entitled under the legislation within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The competent authority with the respondent is likewise directed to recalculate the pensionary benefits of your petitioner and increases accrued thereon the withheld pensionary benefits with effect from stopping to date. Read more
4. Record shows that the petitioner is booked in as much as eight criminal cases under the same offence with different complainants and involving sizable amounts of money. These cases span over the years 2018 to 2020 and three cases have been registered after the registration of the instant case. Regardless that the petitioner has obtained bail in those cases, it does, prima facie, build that the petitioner is prone to repeating the offence.
Note: Please fill any area and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave industry blank.
The Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) is a comprehensive piece of legislation that defines many criminal offenses and prescribes corresponding punishments for people found guilty.
The presiding judge emphasised the need to address the evolving techniques used by counterfeiters, noting that the amendment’s inclusion of technological elements allows to get a more detailed legal reaction.
96 . Const. P. 4965/2023 (D.B.) Saleem Khan V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It truly is very well-settled that website even though looking at the case of normal promotion of civil servants, the competent authority has to look at the advantage of many of the suitable candidates and after due deliberations, to grant promotion to such eligible candidates who are found being most meritorious amongst them. Because the petitioner was held to get senior to his colleagues who were promoted in BS-19, the petitioner was disregarded by the respondent department just to increase favor to the blue-eyed candidate based on OPS, which is apathy around the part in the respondent department.
The issue here is that an accused could say that they meant to injure the sufferer, but they didn't plan to destroy them. In other words, they could claim that thedeath that resulted due to accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor intended.
Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be subject matter on the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani legislation.
Although many websites offer free case law, not all are equally reliable. It’s very important To guage the credibility on the source before depending on the information.
The appellate court determined that the trial court had not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to be gathered by the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.
1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasized the importance of judicial independence as well as separation of powers.
share or interest of a co-owner in immovable property also can sold to another co-owner/co-sharer or perhaps to an stranger and section 44(Transfer of Property Act 1882)
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials performing within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case law previously rendered on similar cases.